Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sebastian Ofner vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ofner vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Ofner vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ofner 1 - 1 Ilkel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ofner has won 49.6% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 46.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ofner, in recent form, has won 47.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.75% and 25.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ofner has saved 61.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 51.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ofner has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ofner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 22/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 44/ 42). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Ofner has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 17/ 17), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ofner winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ofner winning 2 and Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Ofner and Ilkel was at the Tampere Challenger, 27-07-2017, Second, Clay with Sebastian Ofner getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ofner and Ilkel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ofner winning 0 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ofner winning 0, and Ilkel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ofner has played against opponents with an average rank of 168.45 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 224.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ofner has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ofner has converted 45.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 40.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
45
Rank
37
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
412
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (354-265)
Career Total W/L
56% (401-313)
45% (13-16)
YTD W/L
39% (9-14)
$1,214,085
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sebastian Ofner | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 21 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:17 | 1:26:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (59/121) | 58% (76/131) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (44/59) | 67% (51/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (35/62) | 45% (25/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 25% (4/16) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (55/131) | 35% (42/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Cem Ilkel
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Sebastian Ofner
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sebastian Ofner | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (13/16) | 39% (9/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (37/39) | 39% (20/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (374/381) | 45% (208/257) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 33% (4/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 211 | 113 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:38 | 1:29:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 161.24 | 171.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1289/2301) | 57% (805/1413) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (969/1289) | 70% (566/805) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (502/1012) | 47% (284/608) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (72/159) | 40% (38/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (817/2276) | 36% (479/1345) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 47% (7/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (12/27) | 36% (8/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (5/14) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 70% (10/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 30% (10/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 26% (19/5) | 15% (13/2) |
Sebastian Ofner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Terence Atmane
56%
(
87 of
156)
1st Serve %
54%
(
85 of
156)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
63 of
85)
51%
(
35 of
69)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
37%
(
58 of
156)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
64 of
156)
162
Total Points Won
150
|
3-6 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Sebastian Ofner
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Rinky Hijikata
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Ivan Gakhov
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Hendrik Jebens
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Sebastian Ofner
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Cachin
Player
Sebastian Ofner
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Sebastian Ofner
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Pavel Kotov
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Sebastian Ofner
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ofner Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sebastian Ofner
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
